​Over the last couple of months on the Bug Lessons blog, we have taken a closer look at the specific components of IPM. We’ve gone over pest identification and setting guidelines to determine when to use what action. This month in our IPM series, we’re going to discuss the monitoring and assessment phase of an IPM plan. Monitoring helps you figure out where and how serious the problem is, while assessment helps you figure out if the program is working—read on to make sure you’re assessing pest situations properly!

If you recall, in our first couple of blogs, we emphasized a few criteria that need to be met before reaching the assessment/monitoring step. First, it is critical to properly identify the pest in question before engaging in any sort of pest management strategy. Once the pest is identified, you must set guidelines that dictate when action will be taken. This depends on the pest and the client in question. Once those steps have been taken, it is then time to start assessing pest numbers and damage to see whether i) actions you have taken previously are working, or, ii) whether or not action should be taken at this stage. For instance, monitors such as sticky traps used to identify the pest may have solved the problem if the pest issue was very mild.
 
When assessing pest numbers and/or damage, a few things should be kept in mind, like:
 

1. Is the pest present or absent?
2. Is the pest distributed everywhere, or sporadically?
3. Is the pest increasing, or decreasing in numbers?
4. Have I placed monitoring devices in the most optimal locations for sampling?
5. Have we exceeded thresholds for action set previously?
6. What are the obvious and less obvious signs of pest damage? How has my client defined “damage”?

 
Assessing the situation will require continued monitoring and frequent assessments that should be made during the monitoring process. There are a few ways to do this and use the information for assessment—each require a different amount of labor input.

​Casual observation involves walking around the area and noting what you see. This might involve documenting obvious pest-conducive conditions that should be remedied (e.g., leaky pipes, spilled foods), observing obvious pest activity, or clear pest control action taken by the client (e.g., client-placed ant baits). Notes should be taken so that all information can be communicated to the client. For instance, if sanitation is recommended to prevent pest-conducive conditions—on the next follow up you can record whether or not these actions were taken. That information can be correlated to pest density.
 
This strategy may be enough for low level infestations, or situations where the client has a very high action threshold.

​Monitoring the areas where pest activity is most likely using things like sticky or pheromone traps is less intensive than area-wide monitoring (see below), but more intensive than casual observation. In addition to logging pest density, other information should be logged after a thorough visual inspection as well. For instance, are there less obvious signs of pest-conducive conditions, like structural deterioration or small cracks and crevices that would support insect harborages? Is there evidence of pest activity away from monitoring devices? Is it clear that there are obstacles preventing humans from limiting pest numbers, such as doors that are open frequently to accept shipments? Additionally, record keeping should be very precise when monitoring. These data will allow you to adequately assess whether more action is necessary to manage the problem and whether assessment input should be increased.
 
This strategy could work for a moderate infestation that is not entirely out of control. It is probably appropriate for a residential household.

​Area-wide monitoring involves assessing pest activity in areas where pests may or may not be active. For instance, if a building has a rodent issue, monitoring may be expanded to outdoor areas in addition to indoor problem areas. Perhaps an outdoor mosquito monitoring program is expanded to look for structural issues that may be supporting population growth—in addition to monitoring the lawn and landscape. This may involve assessing things like lawn care practices, ornamental plant presence, weather or environmental conditions, building drainage, electrical wiring, etc. A great example of using monitoring for area-wide assessment is the placement of pheromone monitors in a grid-like pattern in buildings with stored product pest problems. As with the other two methods of assessment, record-keeping should be mandatory to assess the need for current or continued action.
 
This sort of assessment strategy would be most appropriate in sensitive environments such as schools or hospitals, food production facilities, or any other area where the tolerance for pests is very low. It may also be appropriate in a residential setting where the client has a very low action threshold.
 
It is important to note that for any of these approaches to work, you must be using and placing pest monitors in appropriate locations according to label instructions. Otherwise, false negatives may occur (this is when you get see no pest activity but pests are present). Feel free to view other Bug Lessons cheat sheets and blogs to take a look at the habits of some of the most common urban pests to help you decide where monitoring should occur.

Assessing pest damage may be easy or difficult depending on the extent of infestation. The client may define “damage” in their own way, too. It is up to you and the client to decide during the assessment phase whether the program is working (i.e., whether pests have been reduced or eliminated), or, whether continued input and action is needed. Next week, we will talk about preventing future pest problems, which involves reducing the number of environments conducive to pest activity. This often reduces pest to an acceptable level of damage with no additional input needed. See you next time! 

​We’ve talked about ‘green’ pesticides before. Many ‘green’ pesticides contain one or more essential oils in their formulas. Although a number of studies report on the supposed efficacy of essential oils against insects, we see, comparatively, relatively few essential oil pesticide products on the shelf. Why? In this week’s blog, we’ll go over some of the pitfalls related to essential oil product development that have more to do with product development and less with political, legal, and personal stances on the ‘green’ pest management movement. However, for a commentary on those topics—check out our other blog post linked above!

​Essential oils and other related natural products are considered attractive alternatives to synthetic chemicals for insect pest management. The efficacy of many of these compounds has been demonstrated in peer-reviewed scientific studies. For example, mint oil can be repellent to fire ant workers and neem oil can kill bed bugs. But in spite of preliminary laboratory trial successes, there simply aren’t all that many EO products on the market. Why?
 
Authors of a recent study have identified a few issues with EO compounds that could be the limiting factors impacting commercialization of EO insecticides. First, EOs tend to have high volatility, meaning they evaporate pretty quickly. This allows EO compounds to serve as great fumigants, but, if a compound evaporates too quicky, it can impact efficacy. Evaporation of product means that there is no residual deposit left to kill insects that visit treated sites later. This is one of the main benefits of many synthetic products. If you have to re-apply EO products over and over to achieve the same result as a synthetic counterpart, labor and other tradeoffs may be unattractive to consumers or pesticide applicators.
 
Additionally, we still don’t completely understand how many of these EO compounds act against insects physiologically. Without understanding how these compounds work, it is difficult to start developing products that kill bugs in a consistent way. This may deter end users who want to know exactly how a product will perform in a given situation. For example, we know exactly where pyrethroid compounds act on insects and can explain their function clearly to end users. From product to product, they perform fairly similarly. We know how to rotate products when pyrethroid resistance to this synthetic active develops. EOs are much less predictable.
 
Finally, sourcing EOs can be exceptionally problematic. The cost of any given EO varies immensely depending on how oils are extracted and distilled from plants. Marketing can also be confusing. For instance, makers of “lemon eucalyptus oil” hint that this compound is the same as “oil of lemon eucalyptus”—but they certainly are not equivalent. Lemon eucalyptus oil is cheaper to produce and does not have the same mosquito repellent properties. These sort of mix ups make the EO product landscape confusing for consumers and difficult for manufacturers. Without organizational oversight and regulation, it is difficult for manufacturers to justify the high cost of production for quality oils when consumers often opt to purchase lesser quality product at a lower cost.
 
Currently, many EO products are exempt from FIFRA registration. Although this makes the registration process much faster and lower cost, it also means less oversight and an uneven competitive landscape. Until the registration model changes, including the adoption of more stringent efficacy testing requirements for EO products, we may continue to see a lack of innovation in this category from many pesticide manufacturers.

​EO products have potential to serve as novel, innovative compounds that can be used effectively in pest control. The efficacy of many of these compounds has been confirmed in laboratory trials. Yet, adoption of EO products by the pest management industry and widespread availability of effective natural compounds for consumer-based pest management is currently lacking. It would be wonderful if we had access to additional active ingredients to combat pest infestations. Hopefully, the issues highlighted here are addressed to allow for more proliferation of effective natural EO compounds that are equivalent (or close to equivalent) to their synthetic counterparts in the marketplace. This would allow manufacturers to meet the clear consumer demand for natural product alternatives, as well as the product effectiveness needed by pest management professionals whose livelihood depends on delivery of functional insecticides.

​Many in-home pest problems can be solved or significantly reduced with pest-proofing through exclusion. If a bug can’t get inside, it can’t cause a problem, right? In this week’s blog, let’s discuss a few ways to make your home impenetrable to the army of insects and other pests trying to find their way inside before insects start to set up shop indoors during the fall. 

​Did you know that a house mouse can enter a dwelling through an opening as small as ¼” in width? Small and often overlooked openings in and around the home provide a perfect way for pests to invade your space. Pest-proofing is important because not only can it prevent pest entry, it can reduce pest movement and establishment within a structure, too—making bugs and other pests easier to control if they do somehow get inside. Termed “exclusion”, this step is often one of the first in an integrated pest management plan. Exclusion is an effective way to control pests without the need for pesticides.
 
Many of the materials you need for pest-proofing are found at your local hardware store and are probably materials you have used before for simple home repairs (note: this may not be the case for rodents—see this article for help with proper rodent exclusion). Otherwise, here a few easy things you can do to take the steps required to block entry before pests give you a headache.

1. Apply caulk to the cracks around windows, doors, and other exterior-facing components of the home. To see where there are points of entry, turn on the interior lights and walk the exterior at night. Use silicone or acrylic latex caulk to fill any areas where light escapes. Acrylic latex is less flexible than silicone, but cleans up easily with water and it can be painted over. If the area is likely to take on water frequently (e.g., under sinks, around bathtubs or toilets)—use silicone. If you are worried about aesthetics, clear-drying caulks are easier to use because they do not show mistakes like pigmented caulk.
​
2. Apply silicone caulk to tubs, toilets, pipes, and any other area where water tends to pool and/or leak. This will discourage the entry of insects looking for water.

3. Seal any utility openings that are present. These sites are where pipes and wires enter the foundation and siding, such as around outdoor faucets, gas meters, dryer vents, etc. These are exceptionally common entry points for insects and other animals. You can close these openings with a number of materials—really any suitable sealant is appropriate. The choice will depend on the site, as well as how large the opening is. Example materials include, but are not limited to, cement, caulk, expandable foam, and steel wool.

4. Install door sweeps and weather stripping on and around all doors. Like we mentioned in step one, you can assess whether there are gaps around door frames by looking for light filtering in above, below, and around the sides of the doorway. Gaps of only 1/16” or less can allow insects and other arthropods inside. Keep in mind that corners are the most susceptible to pest entry. These recommendations apply to garage and sliding doors as well—in general, garages are also especially susceptible to pest entry.

5. Make sure that all window and door screens are in good repair. This will cut down on the entry of flying insects. However, very small insects like leafhoppers or gnats are able to penetrate standard-sized window screen mesh. If you see high numbers of small insects and you have evaluated your screen for holes or tears and found none, the best solution is to leave windows closed during periods of high insect activity. If you really would like leave the windows open, sticky traps/fly paper can quickly capture flying insects as they enter.​

6. Wire mesh can be installed over vents in the attic, roof, or crawl space. Chimney caps exclude nuisance vertebrates like birds and racoons. The mesh used in these areas should be ¼”. Be careful during installation as the wire can be quite sharp at the edges.

7. Deal with standing water and other areas that hold moisture. Trim back bushes so that they offer less shade to insects. Make sure that ornamental plants are not touching the structure, as this essentially gives insects a bridge right into the home. Be sure to fill or otherwise eliminate holes in the yard that hold standing water, even for a short time.

​8. Take this time to do a pantry clean-out as well. No tools required! Throw away expired foods, store foods in in glass or plastic instead of cardboard or paper, and make sure that none of your food products have any evidence of insect or rodent activity (e.g., frass, webbing, gnaw marks).

​Last month on the Bug Lessons blog, we took a deeper dive into the specific components of IPM. This month in our IPM series, we’re taking a closer look at the pest identification process and action guideline setting for your program. These introductory steps are crucial in designing an effective pest management program—read on to make sure you’re executing these critical steps correctly!

If you recall, in our first couple of blogs, we emphasized that it is critical to properly identify the pest in question before engaging in any sort of pest management strategy. Treating for the wrong pest can cause failure of an IPM program because a successful program hinges on understanding pest biology and behavior. Here are some helpful tips and resources that will have you feeling like an entomologist in no time!
 

1. Record where you found the insect/pest. Insects live in specific habitats. Understanding where a pest lives will help narrow down what it could possibly be. The more specific you can be, the better. This information will also help an expert make a proper identification if you are unable to.
2. Note the time of day when the pest is most active. Insects and other arthropod pests are on a schedule. Most operate at a very specific time of day. Recording when you see the pest moving around the most, or when you see the most of them, might be important information.
3. Does it fly, crawl, or jump? Observe the insect and record how it prefers to move around.
4. What color is it? Note any distinctive markings and where they are.
5. How many legs does it have? Insects have six legs. If the pest has more, it is not technically an insect.
6. Do you see a head, thorax, and abdomen (i.e., three distinct body segments)? Insects have three separate body parts. Sometimes, they may be hard to see. However, if you can, try to see if you can spot all three. If you only see two, you are probably dealing with an arachnid (spider/tick, etc.). More than three segments indicates another type of pest, too (earthworms, for instance).
7. Does the pest have antennae? What do they look like? If you can get close enough, observe the pest’s antennae (if present). These are two filamentous looking body parts that are located on the front of the head. Make note of the shape, length, and appearance. Are they fuzzy? Are they bent at the ends? Do they look beaded, or are they straight?
8. How does it eat? Did the insect bite you and suck blood? Does it have mandibles and you see it chewing? Is it sucking up liquids? Try to assess whether the pest has chewing or sucking mouthparts.
9.  Take a photo! Maybe you do not have time to assess all of these questions in real time. That’s okay! Take a photo or video of the pest, if possible. This will allow you to identify the insect even if it disappears before you can capture it. Do your best to take clear photos. It is even better if you include another object in the photo for scale. Insects vary in size and a reference can be helpful.

​Once you have all of this information, there are a few ways to proceed. If you think you can identify the insect yourself but need a little help/confirmation—there are some great online databases that can help. For instance, BugFinder allows users to start an ID based on the silhouette of the pest in question. Another helpful website is BugGuide.net, which even has an option for registered users to make identification requests. Community members on the website are often more than happy to chime in with assistance!
 
If you prefer to have someone else make the identification for you, reach out to an extension specialist and entomologist employed at a land-grant university. The USDA has a handy list to help you find the university closest to you. Department webpages often list the extension faculty for the public to access. You can also reach out to cooperative extension offices, where an extension agent might be able to assist.
 
Please remember that entomologists are NOT trained medical doctors or dermatologists. Rashes/bites/tissue samples, etc., are not the way entomologists identify insects and they will not make pest identifications based on suspected bite reactions. If you suspect you are dealing with a pest that is causing bite marks, allergic reactions, and other maladies and you cannot obtain a physical sample of the pest, seek help from a medical doctor before consulting entomologists.

​Once you understand what pest is present, how many you can tolerate should be the next question to address. This number will often hinge on a number of factors, such as cost of treatment, environment where pests are present, personal preferences, potential damage the pest can cause—to name a few. However, establishment of an “end goal” so to speak will prevent potentially unnecessary labor and pesticide applications.
 
The ‘action threshold’ is the point at which pest populations are a level that require intervention. It is a difficult metric to assess. It is certainly more subjective than identifying a pest. In urban pest management, specifically, the action threshold is often set from scratch on a case-by-case basis. For instance, one individual may have a much higher tolerance for the presence of wolf spiders versus another individual. When the pest poses a public health threat, like bed bugs or German cockroaches, the threshold required for action is probably as low as the presence of one bug. The action threshold can be set by the individual who is affected, and is a personal choice. If you are having trouble discerning whether or not you should take action against a pest, you can reach out to extension folks with this question, too!

​Integrated pest management is a very effective way to manage pests, but the process can seem daunting. We hope that by breaking it down piece by piece in this series makes it more straightforward! It is important to remember that your first IPM plan may not go…to plan! Make sure to give yourself flexibility. For instance, maybe you initially think the presence of five ants is no big deal, so you take no action. However, the next day, 30 more workers show up on your counter and your action threshold changes- perhaps five ants would have been a more appropriate action threshold after all. That’s okay! However, if you need more help with these steps of your IPM plan, feel free to contact us at Bug Lessons, or, contact your local extension specialist.

​We’re all pretty aware of pesky beetles feeding on our garden plants, or caterpillars chomping down on farmer’s crops. Usually, humans get pretty annoyed when bugs feed on their food. But recently, scientists were able to use insect feeding to help them trace the evolution of plant ‘sleeping’ movements. Did you know that plants slept? Did you know that we could use insect clues to learn more about the evolution of that phenomenon? We didn’t either! Read on to find out more about a pretty unusual approach scientists took to solve a nagging prehistoric plant puzzle.

Plants can move in some surprising ways. They move in response to environmental triggers, such as wind, light, gravity, humidity, or contact. In addition, some plants follow a circadian rhythm (repeated every 24 hours) that dictates ‘sleeping’-type movements called nyctinasty. Scientists have been interested in nyctinasty, or plant ‘sleeping behavior’, for quite some time. Charles Darwin was so interested in plant movement; he wrote an entire book about it. Although in this seminal work he clearly noted that plants folded their leaves when they went to “sleep”, scientists continued to wonder, “When did this behavior evolve, and why?” Interesting questions, but as an avid reader of an insect blog, you’re probably wondering what questions about plant naps (Bug Lessons’ new moniker for “cat naps”) have to do with bugs. Well, in a recent study, scientists admitted that they used a pretty unorthodox method to investigate the history of plant sleeping behavior. Wouldn’t you know, it involves our favorite six-legged creatures.

Thanks to Darwin, scientists knew that legumes had more ‘sleepy’ species than all other plant families combined. He also identified the organ that controlled sleep movements in plants. However, questions still remained regarding the origin, history, evolution, and benefit of sleep movements because there was no fossil evidence for this process the fossil record. It was impossible to tell if fossilized plants were actually sleeping, or, if they simply died and shriveled up prior to becoming fossilized.
 
Recently, though, scientists documented sleeping behavior in fossilized plants by looking at insect feeding damage on the fossilized leaves from the upper Permian of China. Based on the age of the fossils, scientists could conclude that plants were taking naps as long ago as the late Paleozoic era (250 MYA). Other notable events that occurred in the Paleozoic era included the formation of Pangea and the Appalachian Mountains.
​

​The lead author of the research study, Dr. Feng, was able to figure out that prehistoric insects fed on sleeping leaves based on correlations with insect-damaged leaves he collected in 2013. In the modern (2013) plant samples, Feng noted that insects cut symmetrical holes in leaves because they were feeding on samples when plants were asleep, i.e., when the leaves were folded. Dr. Feng saw identical symmetrical holes in the fossilized leaves.
 
After combing through hundreds of fossil samples, Dr. Feng and his colleagues were able to conclude that i) plant sleeping behavior definitely occurred prehistorically, ii) plant sleeping evolved independently in lots of different plant groups and iii) the pervasiveness of the behavior indicates that it serves some benefit for plants. The study is innovative not just because authors used insects in a unique way, but also because the findings prove that we can identify organismal behaviors, not just structures, in the fossil record. This opens up fossil samples to all sorts of new investigations that were previously untapped. And all because insects are continuing to do what they’ve always done—eat a lot of plants!

​Obviously, fossils are not very dynamic. It is difficult to tell what was happening at the time of fossilization for many organisms. However, we know that insects have been around for millions of years, and they interacted with many different organisms. It will be interesting to see what else we will glean from other fossils based on how insects interacted with them. Hopefully, this gives the masses as well as other scientists a deep appreciation for the sometimes very unexpected roles that insects can play in terms of scientific discovery.

​You know, we talk a lot about insect pests and how to control them on the Bug Lessons blog. However, insects play a very important role in various ecosystems around the world. In this blog, we want to focus on the traits that make insects unique, valuable, and critical to a happy, healthy earth! Read on to find out why bugs are not just foes—in fact, most of them are friends.

Insects are all over the place. We mean that literally; insects are the most abundant animals on the planet. Over 1.5 million species of insects are currently described, and there are probably many more that we haven’t even found yet! There are insects in almost every habitat within every biome and they come in all sorts of colors, shapes, sizes, and exhibit many amazing and unique behaviors. Although we tend to focus on ways to get rid of insects that cause damage, today we are going to go over five reasons why we actually need insects to help sustain us and our planet.

1. Insects form the base of the food web. Insects are the largest food source for animals that eat meat—both on land and in freshwater. Because there are an estimated one quintillion (1,000,000,000,000,000,000) insects on earth at any one time, they outweigh and outnumber all other animals combined. This means that insects are the biggest link between plants and animals in food webs.

​2. Insects are predators, too, and they keep many harmful organisms in check. Although not technically insects, spiders eat anywhere from 400-800 million tons of insect pests annually. Wasps are voracious predators that can consume up to two pounds of pest insects within a 2,000 square foot garden. Called “biological control”, many insects serve as natural enemies of pest insects and we use these insects to control pests in an array of settings (e.g., releasing lady beetles to control aphids in greenhouse settings).

3. You’ve probably already heard the buzz (no pun intended) associated with insect pollinators such as honey bees. Insects play a nearly incalculable role in the pollination of plants. Approximately 75% of plants require an animal pollinator. There are over 200,000 animal pollinators, and the majority of these are insects. Various agency efforts to protect insect pollinators are crucial, because it is estimated that insects provide more than 24 billion dollars to the US economy through their pollination services. 

4. Insects also provide waste services. Many insects are scavengers or decomposers that break down dead or dying materials to form new life. They clean up dung, dead plants, dead animals, and recycle wood—and they turn these waste materials into nutrient rich sources of organic matter for other organisms. Humans may be struggling to understand recycling, but insects have it down pat!

​5. Did you know that some insects and/or insect byproducts can serve as medicine? Bee venom is a powerful compound used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA), gout, osteoarthritis, chronic fatigue system, and a number of other ailments. As weird as it may sound, maggots are helpful in cleaning up infected wounds. Maggots eat the infected tissue, leaving healthy tissue behind. This is a strategy that has been utilized since the Mayans. Scientists are still researching other uses for insects as medicine, too, so stay tuned!

Insects have been around since well before the dinosaurs. They were the first flying creatures on earth and have managed to survive multiple mass extinctions. Insects do not need humans, but humans certainly need insects to survive and thrive. Nonetheless, insect diversity and abundance are declining. It is up to all of us to be aware of threats to beneficial insects, such as monoculture, forestry practices, loss of habitat, pesticide use, climate change, and invasive species. In addition to awareness, we need to take action against these threats, too. A loss of insects could, quite literally, threaten our existence. There will always be a need to control damaging pest arthropods, but in our haste to kill or hate insects, let’s be sure to take a moment to appreciate just how much these little critters do for us. For a bit more information, check out this article and helpful video from The Florida Museum.

Who knew that a species of fungi that consumes insects (mainly ants) would be such a hot topic in 2023? Unexpectedly, “The Last of Us”, a post-apocalyptic zombie show based on a popular video game, had everyone talking about Ophiocordyceps unilateralis—zombie-ant fungus. This week, we want to get the facts straight while season two continues development and we reminisce about a brilliant season one! What is an entomopathogenic fungus? Why can’t a species of Ophiocordyceps, or something similar, become a zombie-human fungus? Finally, how does this species manipulate its host in such a frightening way? Read on to find out the less dramatic, but equally fascinating, story about these mind mushing monsters.

​Simply put, entomopathogenic fungi are fungi that kill or seriously impair insects. They span the entire fungal kingdom and there are multiple ways that these organisms attack and kill insects. Many of the strategies are nightmare-inducing. For instance, one species that attacks cicadas plugs their butts, and scatters spores from the sky as they fly around. “The Last of Us” chronicles the zombie-ant fungus, which controls an ant’s muscles until the ant dies and a fruiting body explodes from its’ head. Some of these pathogens can attack a wide array of insects, and some are very host specific. Some broad-spectrum insect killers, like Beauvaria bassiana have been turned into pesticides. Ophiocordyceps, the pathogen we’re talking about in this blog, is host-specific. Each species of Ophiocordyceps attacks a specific insect species.

​Ophiocordyceps, the group of fungi that inspired the latest zombie phenomenon, contain over 100 species that attack insects like moths, butterflies, and beetles. At least 35 species within the group are capable of performing some sort of “mind control” on the host. According to experts, there may be as many as 600 species in this group waiting to be described. Each species is matched to its specific insect host. For example, Ophiocordyceps odonatae attacks dragonflies (Order: Odonata).

​Let’s focus on Ophiocordyceps unilateralis for this part, the zombie-ant fungus. The life cycle of this fungal species can be described in four parts: infection, death grip, stalk growth, and dispersal. Spores (the infectious part) of this species targets a type of carpenter ant (Camponotus leonardi). Spores attach to the cuticle (skin) of a passing ant and begin to secrete digestive enzymes that start eating away at the ant’s body so that they can enter the host. Then, yeast-like growth begins inside. This eventually causes the ant to fall from the tree canopy to a lower height that is more optimal for fungal growth. To control movement, the fungus controls ant muscles (so, not technically the ant’s mind like a true ‘zombie’) and prompts the ant to crawl up to a leaf. Then, the ant bites the leaf with a death-grip that keeps it from falling. Once the ant dies, a stalk grows from the base of the neck and exits the head. Spores release, a new ant is infected, and the cycle begins again. Interestingly, healthy ants in a colony can tell when a fellow worker is infected and they will carry the diseased far away to protect the whole.

​Mycologists (folks that study fungi) agree that the chance of an Ophiocordyceps species transition from insects to humans is non-existent. These scary little pathogens are extremely host-specific—they simply don’t have the machinery to survive in people and the leaps that would need to occur for them to adapt to us are just too great. These pathogens, although frightening to watch, keep insect numbers in check and contribute to ecosystem balance. Unfortunately, their only function, maintain natural order, is much less ‘sexy’ than the chaos zombie thrillers want you to think that they can cause. So, for now, rest easy. Bug-killing fungi should only haunt the dreams of insects!

Last month on the Bug Lessons blog, we introduced the concept of integrated pest management (IPM)—a science-based strategy used to control pests in all sorts of environments. This month in our IPM series, we’re taking a closer look at the components of a successful IPM plan. Read on to learn more about the most important steps you can take to control pests in a responsible yet effective way no matter where you are!

Pest Identification: Prior to engaging in any sort of pest management strategy, it is crucial that the pest in question is properly identified. If you cannot identify the organism causing problems, employ a local extension agent or specialist for assistance. This is arguably the most important step in any IPM program. Treating for the wrong pest can lead to program failure because IPM hinges on understanding pest biology and behavior.
 
Setting Guidelines to Determine When to Use What Action: Before action is taken, an idea of how much damage or how many pests can be tolerated should be established. This prevents unnecessary labor and pesticide application. For instance, even one rodent in a commercial kitchen is probably unacceptable whereas a homeowner might be willing to deal with one or more rodents in and around their home. Again, the threshold for action should be established prior to engaging in pest control

Monitoring and Assessing Pest Numbers and/or Damage: Monitoring for pests is the only way to assess whether or not the established damage/pest threshold has been reached. Monitoring allows for the qualitative assessment of what pests are present and the damage they are causing. This step will also help you decide what management methods to employ, as many management strategies are based on pest density (e.g., how much bait to apply for a cockroach infestation). The specific tools used for monitoring are pest-dependent, but devices such as sticky traps are often used. Record-keeping is an important part of monitoring so that you can understand when pests are most active and, thus, the most critical time for action.
​
Preventing Future Pest Problems: Many pest problems are more effectively solved with preventative versus reactive strategies. Sanitation, pest-proofing, reducing hospitable pest environments, etc. should be considered so that the problem does not return. Prevention should really be the first tool in pest management, because it is usually environmentally-friendly, low cost, and effective.

​Using All Control Tactics Available and Reasonable: Ideally, a successful IPM program will utilize a combination of control strategies that synergize one another (i.e., they work better together than separately). It is a common misconception that chemical (pesticide) use is not permitted in an IPM program. Pesticides can absolutely be used in an IPM program, but alternatives should be considered in addition. When pesticides are used, they should be used with consideration for the environment. Some strategies outside of chemical pest control include:
 

1. Biological control: The use of natural enemies like parasites or predators to control pests.
2. Cultural control: Changing practices that might promote pest presence. For example, altering irrigation practices, or choosing plants for the landscape that are adapted to the environment and can resist pest damage naturally. 
3. Physical control: Kills a pest directly, blocks them from an environment, or changes the environment so that it is not suitable for a pest. An example of physical pest control could be heat treatments for bed bugs.

 
Assessing and Adapting the IPM Program: Once action has been taken and all control strategies have been given ample time to work—progress should be evaluated. Were the established thresholds and guidelines from step two met? Are pests still causing excessive damage? If the IPM plan has failed, troubleshooting and additional control measures should be employed.

​Integrated pest management is a great way to control pests while being conscious about environmental impact and preserving the efficacy of chemical pesticides. It is important to remember that your first IPM plan may not go…to plan! These steps can be rearranged as necessary depending on where you are in the pest control process. Steps may also be done in tandem (e.g., preventing pest entry while monitoring pest activity). This roadmap is just a guide. If you need more help designing an IPM plan, feel free to contact us at Bug Lessons, or, contact your local extension specialist.

​It was a rare moment for bug lovers, where media outlets all over the US were talking about insects. In case you missed it, what was with all the metaphorical buzz? Well, TL;DR: a rare Jurassic-era insect was quietly discovered at a Wal-mart in Fayetteville, Arkansas over ten years ago. This went unnoticed until 2020, and, even stranger, no one really talked about it until 2023. So, if you STILL somehow haven’t heard the news, read on to read the bizarre story of a diagnostician’s rare and exciting discovery that truly is one for the history books!

Even experienced diagnosticians and entomologists are known to make an oversight or two! Dr. Michael Skvarla, who is the director of Penn State University’s Insect ID Lab, snagged an (unbeknownst to him) incredibly rare specimen back in 2012 while doing routine shopping at his local Walmart. He recounted to many news outlets that he was walking into the store to simply grab some milk when on the way inside, he saw a huge insect that caught his eye.
 
As entomologists are apt to do, he performed a quick collection on the spot and gently plucked the sizeable bug from its resting place. He described spending the rest of his shopping trip with the specimen in hand. After getting it home, he mounted it, and told reporters that he forgot to do anything with it until 2020. Thinking it was an antlion, he was describing the Jurassic-era specimen to students in his online course when, in real time, he realized he had misidentified the insect. Even more notably, he and his students all got to come to the same conclusion together while they watched the situation unfold online during a lab course.

​Rather than an antlion, according to molecular tests, the specimen was actually a giant lacewing species that predates the dinosaurs. These insects were once common here in the US (even after the extinction of dinosaurs), but they basically disappeared by 1950. No one really knows why, but some cite light pollution and urbanization as probable causes. The discovery is a very rare find given that these insects have been absent from the US for decades. In addition, this recent sighting was the first report of this species in the state of Arkansas, ever. The next closest sighting of another one of these creatures is reported to be over 1,200 miles away. That makes this finding this lacewing in Arkansas rare enough, but even more spectacular—it is the first sighting from the whole of Eastern North America in over 50 years.
 
How did this rare find end up on the side of a Walmart? Perhaps it was attracted to the lights and flew from a more wooded area, “like a moth to a flame”, if we’re being cliché? Or, maybe it hitchhiked in from a western Walmart truck? Either way, researchers are emphasizing this moment as a time to reflect on and further study the biodiversity found in the Ozarks, an area (clearly) teeming with life, but understudied compared to the Southern Appalachian Mountain region.
 
The specimen can now be found in the Frost Entomological Museum at Penn State University. A publication also resulted from the find and can be accessed using this link. Insects rarely make headlines, but this is a great example of the wonderment that can ensue when insects are given a just a bit of the limelight!

​Pesticides are a necessary tool for controlling pest insects that can transmit diseases to people and animals, attack our food, attack our homes, and cause other problems that negatively impact human health and happiness. However, it is important that when we use pesticides outdoors that we are aware of the negative impacts they can have on non-pest insects like honeybees and other pollinators. In this blog, we are going to discuss ways to get control of outdoor pests while also reducing the odds of killing helpful insects like bees!

Pesticides are tools that can be used to control a wide array of pest insects. Unfortunately, helpful insects like predators and pollinators are also impacted by pesticide use. Yes, that includes ‘organic’ or ‘all natural’ pesticides, too. Most products that are labeled to broadly kill insects will kill all insects, especially after direct application (i.e., you squirt the product right onto the bug). However, there are many methods for application that can be used to target the pests you want to get rid of while preserving the safety of helpful bugs. In fact, reducing non-target effects (killing bugs you don’t want to kill) is an important goal of integrated pest management plans. Here, we list some common ways to avoid impacting non-target pollinators, specifically. Fun fact—pollinators include some bugs you might not expect, like native beetles, flies, wasps, and ants!

1.     APPLY PESTICIDES IN THE EVENING 
Most pollinators forage during the day when the temperatures are >55°F. Changing the time of spraying can make a huge difference for non-target insects. Even better—lots of pest insects are active in the evening, like many mosquito species. If you can do it, a dusk/evening application is not only less risky for pollinators than morning or mid-day, but they are also a more efficient way to target pests, too.

2.     DO NOT SPRAY BLOOMS 
If you cannot change when you apply pesticides, you can change where you are applying them. Do your best to avoid spraying flowering plants and blooms. Most pesticidal products will have these instructions on the label. Pollinators are attracted to a wide array of blooms. Spraying elsewhere will reduce the chance that they come into contact with insecticidal products.

3.     CHOOSE THE RIGHT FORMULATION
 
The appropriate choice of formulation is another way to avoid negative non-target impacts on pollinators. Formulation refers to the active ingredient(s) (kills the pest) and inactive (all other) ingredients. Inactive ingredients are often solvents that dilute the active ingredient, and other compounds that make the product shelf-stable. Pesticides come in many different formulations. There are formulations that are less likely to kill pollinators and, when possible, these should be used where pollinators are known to be active. For instance, solutions (S) and emulsifiable concentrates (EC) dry in a short amount of time and do not leave a powdery residue like dusts (D) and wettable powders (WP). Dusty residues might impact pollinators that visit the site later, making solutions and emulsifiable concentrates a better choice for pollinator-prone environments.
 
Granular (G) products are also a good choice for pollinator-heavy areas. Granular products are similar to dusts, but are larger in particle size so they have less risk of drifting during application. Granular products can be broadcast on the soil. They are rarely applied directly to plants and, as such, pollinators do not often make contact with them.
 
Finally, if you are dealing with a specific pest, like ants, you could also use a bait formulation. Baits are meant to be eaten by pest insects and are typically more narrow-spectrum than other products. Pollinators are not likely to come into contact with baits as they are not attracted to them as a food source.

4.     USE A LESS PERSISTENT PRODUCT 

Persistence refers to how long a pesticide remains active in the environment. A product with long residual activity is usually very ‘persistent’. Conversely, using pesticides that degrade rapidly, like pyrethrins, can reduce non-target mortality. A product that degrades in a few hours can be applied with relatively low risk, especially when applied when pollinators are inactive. Many tables can be accessed online which can help you decide which compounds are more/less persistent. Although these tables are often developed with honey bees in mind, they can be relevant for other pollinators as well. Many product labels also contain a “bee box” which should communicate how likely the product is to persist in the environment and pose a risk to pollinators.

5.     ADJUST THE APPLICATION METHOD 
The method of application can also change the risk of non-target effects. Many pollinator deaths occur when a pesticide drifts from the target area into places that are attractive to or occupied by other pollinators. Spraying during windy days greatly increases the risk of drift as does using a misting system. Using granular formulations, soil treatments or application equipment that can target the spray to the intended area will keep pesticides from getting into places they shouldn’t!

​Multiple factors have contributed to the decline in pollinators including climate change, lack of forage, and parasites. Pesticide use, however, can also affect pollinator health when applications are made irresponsibly. The potentially high risks of pesticide applications to pollinators can be significantly reduced with very simple modifications like changing formulation or application time. Pollinators are a valuable agricultural resource and are ecosystem servicers that deserve our respect. However, reducing populations of pests that may make people sick is also crucial and sometimes that means using pesticides outdoors. Balancing pest control with the maintenance of the health of beneficial insects should be at the forefront of everyone’s mind when designing an outdoor pest control program. If you have more questions, here are additional resources from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that may help!